Microsoft 365 & Copilot
More than two decades around the Microsoft productivity ecosystem, with current experience translating Microsoft 365, Copilot and AI capabilities into practical enterprise adoption.
Currently at dentsu · EMEA Microsoft 365 & AI adoption · 46 countries · ~20,000 users
I help international organisations turn Microsoft 365, Copilot and AI capabilities into practical ways of working that people can adopt, organisations can scale and leaders can connect to business value.
With 25 years across Microsoft productivity, consulting, entrepreneurship and enterprise change, I work at the intersection of technology, people, workflows and business outcomes. I currently lead Microsoft 365 and AI adoption across an EMEA environment spanning 46 countries and approximately 20,000 users at dentsu.
The goal is not adoption for its own sake. It is making new capabilities useful in real work, scaling what works responsibly, and building evidence that it makes a difference.
Microsoft 365 · Copilot · Digital Workplace · AI adoption · Work redesign · Business value
I connect Digital Workplace technology with the business scenarios, people, governance and evidence needed to turn new capabilities into sustainable ways of working.
More than two decades around the Microsoft productivity ecosystem, with current experience translating Microsoft 365, Copilot and AI capabilities into practical enterprise adoption.
Design adoption approaches that connect onboarding, communications, learning, champions, managers and ongoing support, rather than treating adoption as a one-off launch.
Work with teams to identify where AI can improve real tasks and workflows, translate those opportunities into practical scenarios, and determine what needs to change around the technology.
Bring business leaders, functions, markets, technology teams and change partners into a shared conversation about priorities, adoption and next decisions across complex matrix organisations.
Help people understand where AI can assist, where outputs need checking, where human judgement remains essential and how accountability works in day-to-day use.
Use adoption, readiness and work-level evidence to understand what is working, where constraints remain and whether changes in tasks and workflows are translating into meaningful business outcomes.
Usage is useful evidence. It is not the outcome.
The important question is whether AI helps people perform relevant work better and whether that improvement survives the rest of the workflow and creates something the organisation values.
A faster draft may create more review work. Time saved only creates value when that capacity is used differently. And some of the most important benefits, including better quality, stronger decisions or improved customer experience, may not initially be financial.
That is why I connect adoption data with evidence about the work itself.
Enterprise AI adoption rarely fails for one reason. The constraint may be the opportunity selected, access, skills, willingness and trust, management behaviour, workflow design, governance, reuse or measurement.
The task is to understand what is actually limiting the outcome before deciding what intervention to scale.
These perspectives coexist. An organisation can be strong in one and constrained in another.
Are we selecting AI applications that can improve a relevant outcome?
Select an area to explore it.
Diagnostic perspectives, not sequential stages.
No combined maturity score.
The constraint that matters most is not automatically the lowest-scoring area. It is the constraint most plausibly preventing the desired outcome.
Unsuitable work, missing access, insufficient capability, low willingness or trust, management decisions, workflow constraints, governance friction, limited reuse or weak measurement can each create different problems.
Start with a business outcome, workflow, owner and decision.
Combine work examples, conversations, observation and data to understand what is limiting progress.
Address the likely constraint and define what evidence would indicate improvement.
Measure what happens to quality, effort, errors, workflow performance and user experience.
Continue, adapt, scale, transfer or stop according to the evidence.
Training fits a demonstrated skills problem. Governance has to work in real scenarios. Workflow problems may require redesign rather than more enablement. And sometimes the right decision is not to scale.
Identify tasks where AI could improve a meaningful outcome, using work examples and conversations with the people doing the work. Useful when the team needs to decide where to start.
Help people practise AI use on tasks relevant to their role, including checking outputs and recognising limits. Useful when skills or confidence are holding back appropriate use.
Help managers set clear expectations, create room for learning and experimenting, address concerns transparently and explain how AI may affect work, capacity and roles. Useful when people need permission, direction, trust or support to change how they work.
Adjust tasks, handovers and review steps so an AI-assisted task improves the whole workflow. Useful when local time savings create extra work elsewhere.
Turn policies into practical guidance on data use, output checks, accountability and escalation. Useful when people are unsure what is allowed or controls are difficult to apply.
Capture working examples and help other teams test and adapt them in their own context. Useful when promising practices remain isolated or have not yet been shown to transfer.
Compare results with a useful baseline, including quality, effort, rework and business outcomes. Useful when usage figures alone cannot support a decision to continue, adapt or stop.
Find and remove practical barriers such as missing permissions, unclear guidance or tools that interrupt work. Useful when people have the skills and motivation but still struggle to use AI.
Work with employees and managers to understand how AI changes tasks, responsibilities, expertise and career development, and make workforce consequences explicit rather than leaving people to infer them. Useful when AI creates uncertainty about roles, workload, skills or future opportunities.
Design how people supervise AI agents that carry out multi-step work, including approval boundaries, monitoring and recovery. Useful when moving beyond individual assistance towards delegated tasks.
My career has moved from Microsoft productivity and training through cloud entrepreneurship and senior consulting into enterprise Microsoft 365 and AI adoption.
The constant has been connecting technology with people, work and business outcomes.
Microsoft 365 & AI adoption
I lead Microsoft 365 and AI adoption across an EMEA environment spanning 46 countries and approximately 20,000 users, connecting regional priorities and Microsoft capabilities with practical ways of working across markets and functions.
My role spans stakeholder partnership, Copilot enablement, role-based scenarios, communications, learning and champion communities, alongside adoption, readiness and usage insight across a complex, distributed organisation.
46 countries · ~20,000 users · EMEA scope
Led Microsoft Office 365 programmes for organisations of up to 5,000 end users.
Combined technology adoption, business analysis and stakeholder engagement across pre-sales and delivery, including business-scenario workshops, adoption programmes and C-level conversations.
This work built the foundation for how I approach AI today: start with what people are trying to accomplish, not with the feature being deployed.
Founded Worktivity Solutions during the early Microsoft cloud market, later developed a Sydney business unit for Paradyne and created the Australian market-entry platform for Storgrid.
The work combined technology, commercial strategy, partnerships, delivery capability and the practical challenge of creating demand for unfamiliar technology.
It also gave me first-hand experience of operating internationally, building capability and making decisions with limited structure around them.
Progressed from Microsoft Office Trainer through senior training and product roles to Operations & Training Manager.
Managed 15 employees, served on the management team and used Microsoft technology and SharePoint to improve internal processes and workflows.
Technology Adoption Manager, EMEA
dentsu · EMEA
Senior Consultant, Cloud Productivity
Breinwave · Netherlands
Channel Manager, Australia / New Zealand
Storgrid · Sydney
Co-owner / Senior Consultant
Paradyne · Sydney
Founder / Consultant, Cloud Productivity
Worktivity Solutions · Amsterdam
Operations & Training Manager
New Horizons Learning · Utrecht
Products & Programs Manager
New Horizons Learning
Senior Microsoft Office Trainer / Consultant
New Horizons Learning
Microsoft Office Trainer
New Horizons Learning
I’m Paul van Lingen, a Netherlands-based Digital Workplace and AI adoption leader.
Over approximately 25 years, my work has evolved alongside Microsoft productivity technology, from Office and SharePoint through cloud collaboration and Microsoft 365 to Copilot and enterprise AI.
Today, I am particularly interested in senior in-house roles where I can help an international organisation scale Microsoft 365 Copilot and AI from initial adoption towards business scenarios, changed workflows, responsible use and measurable value.
I am based in the Netherlands and particularly interested in EMEA or global roles that can be operated from the Netherlands in an international hybrid or remote model.
Languages
Dutch · native
English · fluent
Education
Industrial Engineering and Management
Technical University Eindhoven · Propedeuse
If you are building an enterprise Digital Workplace, Copilot or AI adoption capability and the challenge is no longer simply deploying the technology, I’d be interested in the conversation.
Connect on LinkedInContact me through LinkedIn to discuss a role or request my CV.